#AUTOPANO VIDEO 3 RENDER FAST FILE TV#

I do that with my RED in 6K (funnily enough a 2:1 sensor, well: 6144 (h) x 3160 (v)) or with my photography, for 3D in 40K+ 32bit/channel/float or for my art in 16K+ at least 16bit/channel/integer equirectangulars. Perhaps we will see a six panel view packed closer than the cross for this, which would be 3:2, close to 16:9-again.ДЇor now, my best idea is, to produce always above the needs, and sample down. This format is 4:3 (or 3:4) and would have been better suited for SD back in the days. The вЂњCrossвЂќ available as conversion in C4D, would be the better solution, given less distortion, and a better workability during production, fixing patches, etc. Going back to my research about VR in the early вЂ90s, the main vision was, besides HMD вЂњThe CubeвЂќ, a six sided box with large 1:1 screens. If we talk about вЂњstereoвЂќ or 3D-VR, then the format would be, based on eqiurectangular, better 4:1 or even 1:1. The Zenith and Nadir areas are heavily distorted, as even a quick look at it unveils easily. Is it the best option (?), not in general, but for mainly horizontal oriented users, it might be. I shoot since decades panoramas, and in case of 360Вєx180Вє my typical storage is the equirectangular projection.

#AUTOPANO VIDEO 3 RENDER FAST FILE TV#

Perhaps, this time we can see a change, since smart-phones and tablets seemed to have a typical one year cycle/lifetime these days, and represent a mix of TV and computer. Production wise, that is a different story, there we have to keep it hi-end. Sadly, not often is what technically possible as well the final decision for the end user. Typically not the best solution wins (Beta vs VHS for example), it might win what reaches into the most households, or what is the most cost effective. This huge shift will take time, based on the hardware installed in hundred of million households. Since over ten years we see that computer and TV-sets merges more and more. My best guess is, (and my personal idea bout) that TV standards (UHD) and its processing, as well storage option will be a reason. Previously, I did 360 renders from 3ds max which was a doddle to do but C4D could never do these easily before now. I Love this plugin! Been looking for a way for ages to create 360 from C4D. This does not make much sense though, as the final image will be viewed in a spherical environment and not flat.ДЄs I say, I am just curious as to why 16:9 was chosen over the standard 2:1 equirectangular format. I see that YouTube is recommending 16:9 as this does not create black bars on their viewer I have been using Kolor products for creating 360 video and their settings are also 2:1 ratio.ДЇacebook also recommends outputting in a 2:1 ratio. I have worked with spherical photography for 10 years and 360 is always shot at 2:1. Out of curiosity, is there a reason why the output settings are set to 16:9 ratio and not 2:1 equirectangular?

Autopano video 3 render fast file